According to the online British and World English
Oxford Dictionaries, the word gay
has four different meanings assigned to it. Two of those meanings, the use of gay to mean ‘light-hearted and carefree’
and the use of gay to mean ‘brightly
coloured, showy’, are both said to be ‘dated’. The primary meaning of gay
in current usage appears to be its reference to a ‘homosexual, especially a
man’. Interestingly, though, a fourth meaning of ‘foolish, stupid or
unimpressive’ has been documented. In this latter case, the use of gay is said to be ‘informal, often
offensive’.
Using sociolinguistic methods, researcher Justyna
Robinson investigated the semantic changes-in-progress of the word gay to see whether such an analysis can
provide further insights into the variation and change of this word. She traced
the word across selected data from the British
National Corpus and the Oxford
English Corpus and found that the corpora data supports the perception that
gay is undergoing semantic change.
She found that the older sense of gay
‘happy’ is diminishing, balanced by an increase in the use of gay ‘homosexual’. She also found that
the data provides evidence that gay
can mean ‘lame’ (meanings similar to the dictionary definitions of ‘foolish, stupid’
or even ‘boring’) but also that it can mean
‘unmanly’ to refer to activities considered to be ‘effeminate’ or ‘not
masculine enough’.
Robinson also analysed the speech of 72 speakers born and bred in South
Yorkshire that she had interviewed as part of a larger project on semantic change. The speakers
represented different age groups (age range: 11-94), genders and socio-economic
groups. From these speakers, Robinson elicited all the different senses of gay that each participant knew and, once
more, she found that the most salient senses of the word gay matched the meanings of ‘happy / bright’, ‘homosexual’, ‘lame’
and ‘unmanly’.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, she found that it was the older speakers who
retained the most use of gay in the
sense of ‘happy, bright’ and that the younger generations, most notably young
males still in education, were the main users of the most recent sense of gay to mean ‘lame’. For the older
speakers, their views about the shift in meaning of gay were often expressed in negative terms and Robinson reports
comments such as ‘I really fight against the use of this word [as
‘homosexual’]. I object strongly to hijacking of the word’. In general, as is
often the case with language change, a ‘common, nostalgic narrative’ emerges
among the older speakers. The majority of younger speakers seem to be aware of
the use of gay to mean ‘happy /
bright’ but it has not been part of their usage. Their comments were more
likely to be along the lines of ‘it used to mean’ or that ‘happy / bright’ was
the ‘older meaning’. The younger speakers assigned meanings to gay ‘lame’ ranging from ‘boring’
(school, lessons, friends) to ‘not interesting’, ‘weird’, ‘annoying’, ‘bad’,
‘rubbish’ and ‘stupid’. None of the speakers in the study seemed to suggest
that this usage projected homophobic undertones, a concern that has been raised
in other academic literature.
While it seems that teenage boys use gay ‘lame’ the most, Robinson’s analysis showed that young adult
males employ gay in a slightly
different way, in the sense of ‘unmanly’ and that it is used to describe activities such
as ‘eating salad’ or ‘carrying an umbrella’. Used in this way, Robinson argues
that gay projects masculinity through
distancing a speaker from anything considered ‘effeminate’ or ‘not masculine
enough’. She suggests that men use gay
in this way (note that no women in the study used gay in this sense) to challenge the masculinity of other men. Once
more, though, these participants clearly indicated that they did not think this
sense was used as a homophobic pejorative but that it applied to behaviour that
goes against traditional notions of masculinity, particularly as they might
pertain to local ‘northern’ English toughness.
Robinson concludes by tracking the different stages of change for the
word gay and shows that older
meanings often overlap with newer meanings, with the newest meaning of gay ‘lame’ emerging along with the meaning of gay ‘unmanly’.
______________________________________________________
Robinson, J. (2012). A gay paper:
why should sociolinguists bother with semantics? English Today 28: 38-54.
Doi: 10.1017/SO266078412000399
This summary was written by Sue
Fox
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.