In pursuit of the ideal body?
There is no doubt that cosmetic surgery in the UK and the US (and many
other countries) is big business and is still a growing industry. Over 10,000
women in the UK underwent surgery for breast enlargement in 2011, and one can
only hazard a guess at the number of people undergoing non-surgical procedures,
such as botox injections. Research studies have shown that media representations
of cosmetic surgery tend to present operations as a quick and easy solution to
achieving a changed (and ideal) body and, in the process, feeling better about
one’s self, without paying very much attention to the risk or recovery times
involved. So how do cosmetic surgery advertisements convey these ideas?
Researchers Maria Martinez Lirola and Jan Chovanec collected a set of
20 cosmetic surgery leaflets handed out to passers-by in the streets of
Alicante (Spain) by a leading Spanish cosmetic surgery clinic during the years
2007 to 2009. Their research aimed to show how the advertisements combined
language and visuals to persuade people, mainly women, to have cosmetic
surgery. They analyse two of the leaflets in depth but they also make relevant
points about the leaflets in general.
The visual characteristics involved in the construction of meaning
within the leaflets are described in terms of dominance, frames and
information. It was noted that in 19 out of the 20 texts the dominant
picture was of a young, white woman, usually scantily clothed in a seductive
pose and accompanied by a man. The researchers state that the woman is the main
focus because although cosmetic surgery is offered to men, women are the
primary clients. All of the men and women in the pictures were in fact white
and young, representative of the main intended audience. The use of frames
refers to other visual elements of the text and where they are placed. In the
leaflets, pictures of other people are much smaller than the main picture and
placed in frames around the side. The layout of information is also important;
new information is usually placed to the right, the top of the page is
associated with the ‘ideal’ and the bottom associated with the ‘real’. The
leaflets contained the logo and name of the cosmetic surgery clinic at the top,
placing the perception of cosmetic surgery within a medical frame. The bottom
part of the leaflets usually showed the bigger parts of the body and any
display of ‘action’ (e.g. in one leaflet the woman plays with the strap on her
underwear). The centre of such texts usually coincides with the main
information.
The researchers note that the linguistic elements of the text enhance
and complement the visual aspects of the advertising messages. The texts used
‘highly positive evaluative expressions and instructional phrases’ of the kind
shared with other kinds of advertising. Adjectives such as ‘best’ and ‘highest’
were used and rhetorical questions (e.g. ‘what else can we ask for?’) were also
frequently used. Common persuasive techniques running through the texts related
to competitive pricing, a free gift, the rhetoric of numbers (e.g. ‘over 10,000
patients’), claims about the professionalism of staff and the positioning of
cosmetic surgery within a medical frame. All of these devices are aimed at
persuading potential clients that surgery is safe and affordable and, the
researchers claim, the advertisements also play subtly on inner fears of
ageing.
Martinez Lirola and Chovanec point out that images of ‘ideal-looking’
women serve to act as a model towards which other women could (and should)
aspire. The surgically enhanced body suggests that it is the key to ‘women’s
self-esteem, self-confidence and physical perfection’ and that it is ‘the
target of male voyeuristic desire’. Of course, as the researchers rightly note,
the persuasive techniques also fulfill the aim of generating profits for the
cosmetic surgery providers.
________________________________________________________
Martínez Lirola, María and Chovanec, Jan (2012).
The dream of a perfect body come true: Multimodality in cosmetic surgery
advertising. Discourse and Society 23(5):
487-507.
doi: 10.1177/0957926512452970
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.