Men
who pronounce their words less distinctly are perceived as more macho, or so the
research of Kevin Heffernan suggests. Many previous studies have found a gender
difference in how we articulate our words, with men tending to articulate less
precisely than women. However Heffernan is the first linguist to show that some
men articulate more precisely than other men, and that this appears to cause
listeners to perceive them differently.
Heffernan
recorded 8 radio DJs from XM Satellite Radio, a North American for-profit
company that broadcasts over 170 stations. Between them the DJs covered 6
musical genres: classical, Country and Western, popular, hard rock, punk and
heavy metal. He then asked university students (9 men and 6 women) to judge the
DJs’ voices on 10 different attributes, such as how friendly they sounded or
how technically competent the students thought they were. Statistical analyses were
used to group attributes that received similar scores into 4 groups that
Heffernan interpreted as indicating the DJs’ personality, regional accent,
social class and masculinity. Masculinity correlated
with the scores for machismo, self-confidence, composure and estimates of the
DJs’ physical size.
Heffernan
then measured four features of the DJs’ pronunciation, to see whether there was
any correlation between precise articulation and the social attributes that the
DJs had been judged to possess. One feature was how distinct from each other
were pronunciations of the six vowels /i, e, æ, u, o, ɑ/,
while two others concerned types of contrast in the length of different vowels:
for example, the vowel in the word beat is
usually longer than the vowel in bit,
though the actual difference in length varies from one speaker to another. The
fourth feature analysed was the pronunciation of the final consonant in the
word with. In fast speech this sometimes
sounds like a /d/ or a /t/, depending on the type of sound that follows. On
each of these four measures, Heffernan found a significant correlation between
the DJs’ articulation and the ratings they had been given for their perceived
masculinity: those DJs judged as sounding more
masculine produced phonetically less distinct speech.
There was little or no relation between the
judgements of the DJs’ personality or social class and the precision of their
articulation. Interestingly, though, judgements of their regional accent also
correlated to some extent with the clarity of their articulation. Perhaps this
is because regional accent is sometimes associated with masculinity: Heffernan
points out that Southern US accents, for example, have been associated in
experiments with male-dominated institutions such as the American military.
Heffernan does not comment on the music that the
DJs were associated with but, for the record, the DJ who received the highest
scores on the masculinity group of attributes played heavy metal while the DJ
with the lowest scores played classical music. However the conclusion of the paper
relates not to the music but to the fact that precision in articulation can
send subtle messages about the personal characteristics of the person who is
speaking – in this case, about how macho the speaker is.
_______________________________________________
Kevin Heffernan (2010) Mumbling is macho:
Phonetic distinctiveness in the speech of American Radio DJs. American Speech 85 (1): 67-90.
doi 10.1215/00031283-2010-003
This summary was written by Jenny
Cheshire
The mumblings may show a man as being macho, but the image they used looks like ovaries and a uterus. Ironic and lovely.
ReplyDelete