The use of mobile phones allows us to
exploit communication through both written (text messages) and spoken (phone
calls) language. Whether we choose one mode over another depends on many
factors. For example, research has shown that teenagers often choose text
messages over phone calls because they are cheaper and faster than making a
call and because they are more convenient in that they can take place anywhere
and at any time. On the other hand, teenagers seem to prefer a phone call if
the call is to their parents and usually only call their friends if
they need to explain something or if they have a lot to say.
Researcher Ditte Laursen has been at the
forefront of research on adolescents’ mobile phone communication and in this
recent article she reports not on the choice
of mode but rather on the change of
mode, specifically how participants manage the change of mode from a text
message to a phone call and how both modes interrelate as parts of the same
communication sequence.
The data come from the recordings of mobile
communication (text messages and mobile phone calls) of six 14-year-old friends
who were recorded over a period of six weeks, one week for each person. Laursen
focused on a subsample of mobile communication, which involved 31 young people
and consisted of 481 text messages and 173 calls. She found that the messages
and calls were often linked to other messages and calls. For example, she found
that 100 of the 173 calls were parts of series of calls and that 24 of the calls
were preceded by a text message.
The 24 calls preceded by a text message
were analysed further and Laursen found that after a text message in a
continuing communication sequence, four different types of conversation may
follow:
1)
the answer (after a text message demanding a reply)
For example, a girl sends a text message to her best
friend to say that her boyfriend has let her down. Rather than reply with a
text message, the best friend calls the girl. Laursen suggests that in this
context the call demonstrates a greater commitment than the text message and is
used to ‘upgrade the importance or the seriousness of the text message’. These
calls, which can be seen as a second pair-part in a paired sequence, also allow
for a longer and more complex response than a text message. The
opening sequence in this type of call is said to be minimal since the participants do not need to introduce themselves
or make any initial enquiries (such as how
are you? where are you?).
2)
the reminder (when there is a missing text message)
When a text message is sent and requires a reply which
does not subsequently arrive, a reminder for a response may be made in the form
of a call. Laursen provides an example of a young person who sends a text
message asking another person to meet her the following day to repay some
borrowed money. The person does not respond to the message nor arrives the next
day with the money so the sender makes a phone call which then requires an
immediate response. In these conversations the opening sequence is likely to be
maximal (self-identification,
greetings, initial enquiries). In this way, the caller puts off the reason for
the call and provides the callee with the opportunity to respond to the
unanswered text message (thus avoiding possible conflict).
3)
the resumption of
conversation (picking up a conversation again
after a closed text sequence)
In these cases, there has been a closed text exchange but
it is then followed up by a call which addresses the text message exchange. An
example might be when an arrangement to meet has been agreed via text messaging
but then one person calls the other close to the time of the appointment
perhaps to confirm the meeting. Laursen suggests that the phone call provides
an opportunity to confirm the meeting place and time in an interactive way and
that it gives the conversation ‘an air of urgency’ as the call is made at the
time of, or shortly before, the meeting time.
4)
the confirmation (after a text message with a request for/promise of a call).
These are calls which result from text messages that contain a
request or a promise of a later call, for example calls which follow a text
message which contains the request call
me or a text message which contains the promise I’ll ring you later. These calls are usually made because the
exchange is likely to be complex and will require multiple turns back and
forth. Text messaging in such cases might be deemed as inappropriate.
The study is innovative in that it is
the first study of text messages and mobile calls in interconnected
communication sequences. Laursen argues that text messages and mobile calls are
often intertwined to such an extent that they are not meaningful if considered
separately or taken out of sequence. Her analysis indicates that phone calls
following text messages are often used for complex or lengthy matters and that
they might be considered ‘more valuable than a text message’ when the call is
used to deal with important topics or when used to express emotional aspects of
an interaction such as compassion and sympathy.
_________________________________________________
Laursen, Ditte (2012). Sequential
organization of text messages and mobile phone calls in interconnected
communication sequences. Discourse and
Communication 6(1): 83-99.
doi: 10.1177/1750481311432517
This summary was written by Sue Fox
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.